Sialoi et al v. City of San Diego et al
Edward Sialoi, Kelli Sialoi, Sialoi Sialoi, Jr, September Sialoi, Foleni Sialoi, Gayle Pasi, Lago Sialoi, Liua Sialoi, Hardy Teo Falealili, Tapili Sofa, Garrett Sialoi, Teiano Sialoi, Teiana Sialoi, Teinerosa Sialoi and Braxton Teo Falealili |
San Diego, City of and DOES 1-30 |
3:2011cv02280 |
October 1, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Thomas J. Whelan |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 198 ORDER Regarding Settlement Motions. It is ordered that the Court grants the parties' 195 Joint Motion. Accordingly, in addition to the $150,000 judgment already granted to Plaintiffs, judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiffs i n the amount of $12,000 for costs, and in the amount of $700,000 for attorneys' fees. Given this stipulation of attorneys' fees, the Court grants the parties' request to remove the pending motion 196 for attorneys' fees from the Courts calendar, and more specifically denies as moot plaintiffs' currently pending 182 motion for attorneys' fees. The Court grants the parties' 197 Joint Motion to Deposit Funds. Given the Court's Order, the Court awaits the parties' dismissal of their pending cross appeals to the Ninth Circuit as well as any final motions necessary to close this case. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 6/20/2017. (dxj) |
Filing 180 ORDER on Renewed Motions For Judgment as a Matter of Law: 163 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; 169 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; 170 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; 171 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. It is ordered that the Court denies the parties Renewed Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law. (ECF Nos. 163 , 169 , 170 , 171 .) Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/1/2017. (dxj) |
Filing 109 ORDER on Motions in Limine. The Court grants in part Defendants' first MIL 83 Motion to Exclude, grants in part Defendants' second MIL 84 Motion to Exclude, grants Defendants' third MIL 85 Motion to Exclude, denies Defendants fo urth MIL 86 Motion to Exclude, grants in part Plaintiffs' first MIL 88 Motion to Exclude, grants Plaintiffs' second MIL 89 Motion to Exclude, grants Plaintiffs' third MIL 90 Motion to Exclude, grants Plaintiffs' fourth MIL 91 Motion to Exclude, and grants Plaintiffs' fifth MIL 92 Motion to Exclude. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/18/2016. (kcm) |
Filing 59 ORDER denying Defendants' 50 Motion for Clarification. Dfts failed to demonstrate entitlement to clarification and reconsideration under Rule 60 Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 3/3/2014. (jah) |
Filing 48 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court Grants summary judgment as to Plaintiffs' Monell claim brought under 42 U.S.C. §1983, and Denies summary judgment as to all other remaining issues. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 12/9/2013. (srm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.