Ordonez v. U.S. Department of the Treasury et al
| Marco T. Ordonez |
| U.S. Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service |
| 3:2011cv02340 |
| October 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 6/24/13. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cge)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER: (1) Granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Imposing no Initial Partial Filing Fee and Garnishing Balance from Inmate Trust Account; and (2) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of Complaint. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the ac count and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). (Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR). Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 12/22/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
