Jordan v. Huff
Plaintiff: Imhotep Jordan, Jr
Defendant: Marilyn L. Huff
Case Number: 3:2011cv02405
Filed: October 14, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Imperial
Presiding Judge: Roger T. Benitez
Presiding Judge: William V. Gallo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: (1) Dismissing Civil Action for Failing to Pay Filing Fees and for Failing to Move in Forma Pauperis; and (2) as Frivolous and Malicious. Moreover, because the Court finds amendment futile, leave to amend is denied. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 10/20/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jordan v. Huff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marilyn L. Huff
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Imhotep Jordan, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?