Bell et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
| Michael J, Bell and Zerla Bell |
| American Eagle Real Estate, Inc., Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Litton Loan Servicing LP and DOES |
| 3:2011cv02514 |
| October 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER granting Defendant Litton Loan Servicing LP's 30 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying Defendant American Eagle REal Estate Inc.'s 31 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. All claims against Litton ar e DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend. Defendant American Eagle shall answer within 14 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiffs cursory request for leave to amend the SAC to add a negligence claim against all defendants in this case is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 9/28/2012. (sjt)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER: Granting 18 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint; and Granting 19 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. The Court grants Plaintiffs leave to amend these claims one final time. A Second Amended Complaint shall be filed by 5/18/2012. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/4/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
