Wallack et al v. Idexx Laboratories, Inc et al
| Seth Wallack and San Diego Veterinary Imaging, Inc |
| Idexx Laboratories, Inc, Idexx Reference Laboratories, Inc, Matthew Wright and Stephen Walters |
| 3:2011cv02996 |
| December 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| William V. Gallo |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
165
ORDER Denying 149 Defendants Wright and Walters' Motion for Attorneys' Fees. The hearing set for June 3, 2016 shall be vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 6/1/16. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
158
ORDER Denying Defendants Wright and Walters' 152 Motion to Retax Costs and Granting Defendants' Leave of Court to Refile Bill of Costs with Proper Documentation. The Court Ggrants Defendants leave to refile their Bill of Costs with the Clerk's Office within five days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 5/5/16. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER Denying 103 IDEXX Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court Grants Defendants' request for judicial notice. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/13/2015. (srm)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER Granting 87 Defendants Wright and Walters' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court grants Defendants Wright and Walters' motion for summary judgment on the breach of fiduciary duty cause of action. The hearing set for April 17, 2015 shall be vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 4/15/15. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part 52 , 54 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss; The Court: (1) Denies Defendants Wright and Walter's Motion to Dismiss the breach of fiduciary duty claim; (2) Grants Defendants' Motion to Dis miss the civil conspiracy claim with prejudice; (3) Denies Idexx's motion to strike allegations concerning settlement offers as Moot; (4) Defendants shall file an answer to the second amended complaint pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure. (5) The hearing set for April 18, 2014 shall be Vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 4/14/2014. (srm)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part 37 , 39 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Plaintiffs shall be granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/12/2013. (srm)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part 9 , 15 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Plaintiffs are granted twenty-one (21) days to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 4/11/2013. (srm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
