Lillis v. Apria Healthcare et al
Lance W. Lillis |
Apria Healthcare, Blackstone Investment Group and Doe's 1 through 5 |
3:2012cv00052 |
January 6, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Mitchell D. Dembin |
Irma E. Gonzalez |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 116 ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part 88 , 100 , and 102 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Court Dismisses With Prejudice Defendants Blackstone Group, L.P., Stephen A. Schwarzman, Hamilton E. James, J. Tomilson Hill, Laurence Tosi, and John G. Finley. Plaintiff may file amended complaint within thirty (30) days. The Court Vacates the hearing on this matter set for April 12, 2013. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 4/11/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm) |
Filing 111 ORDER Denying 108 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/25/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm) |
Filing 81 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 51 Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall filed his first amended complaint on or before Monday, October 15, 2012. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 10/5/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.