808 Holdings, LLC v. Collective of December 29, 2011 Sharing Hash E37917C8EEB4585E6421358FF32F29CD63C23C91 et al
| 808 Holdings, LLC |
| Collective of December 29, 2011 Sharing Hash E37917C8EEB4585E6421358FF32F29CD63C23C91 and Does |
| 3:2012cv00186 |
| January 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER Overruling 9 Objections filed by 808 Holdings, LLC; Severing Does; and Dismissing Actions Against All Does Except Doe 1. The Court finds joinder of all Does except for Doe 1 to be improper in all three cases. Accordingly, the Court sever s all Does except Doe 1 and Dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against the severed Doe defendants. To the extent Judge Brooks's Order in 12-CV-186-MMA(RBB) authorized early discovery for five Doe defendants, Plaintiff may now seek early discovery for one Doe defendant in light of the instant Order. Judge Brooks's Orders in all three related cases shall remain in effect in all other respects. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/5/2013.(leh)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 3 Motion for Leave to Take Early Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 5/4/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
