Allen v. Similasan Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Kim Allen
Defendant: Similasan Corporation and Similasan AG
Case Number: 3:2012cv00376
Filed: February 10, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Barry Ted Moskowitz
Presiding Judge: William McCurine
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 268 ORDER Granting 261 Joint Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/17/2017. (knb)
April 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 258 ORDER granting 257 Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. Court conditionally certifies a class for settlement purposes only. Court appoints Karen Hairston and Lainie Rideout as Class Representatives. Court appoints the Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron, APLC, Gomez Trial Attorneys, and Law Offices of Dean Goetz as Class Counsel to represent the Class. Court preliminarily approves the Settlement Agreement. Final Approval Hearing set for 8/7/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Cynthia Bashant. Briefs for the Final Approval Hearing must filed no later than thirty (30) calendar days before the Final Approval Hearing. Class Counsel shall file their application for attorney's fees, costs, and expenses at least forty-five (45) days before the Final Approval Hearing. Court approves Classaura LLC to serve as the Court-Appointed Class Action Administrator for the this Settlement. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 4/12/2017. (jah)
August 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 223 ORDER: (1) denying 216 Joint Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, and (2) denying as moot 211 Motion for Attorneys' Fees. The parties are ordered to contact the Magistrate Judge within five days of this Order to set further scheduling dates. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/9/2016. (kcm)
May 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER Overruling Objections. Court overrules Dfts' 89 Objections to Magistrate Judge Burkhardt's 4/28/2014 Discovery Order. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 5/27/2014. (jah)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Defendant's 80 Motion to Compel Discovery of Plaintiffs' Medical Records. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 5/6/2014. (rlu)
April 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER Granting in part 79 Motion to Compel Production of Defendant's Responsive Documents for Duration of Class Period. The Court Overrules Defendant's relevance objection to producing class discovery for the post-2012 putative class period. The parties are directed to meet and confer regarding a plan to expeditiously proceed with reasonable class discovery responses in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 4/28/2014. (rlu)
March 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 87 TRANSFER ORDER. It is hereby ordered that this case be transferred from the calendar of the Honorable Bernard G. Skomal to the calendar of the Honorable Jill L. Burkhardt for all further proceedings. All future conference or hearing dates set before Magistrate Judge Skomal, if any, are vacated and will be rescheduled before Magistrate Judge Burkhardt. Any dates set before the District Judge remain unchanged. The new case number is 12cv376 BTM (JLB). Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 03/28/14. Motions set before Jill L. Burkhardt.(jcj)
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER Granting Defendant's 43 Motion to Dismiss. The Court Dismisses the Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to file a Third Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs may not add additional plaintiffs or claims without first seeking leave of the Court and showing good cause. Defendant shall not file any further motions to dismiss, but may proceed by moving for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/27/2013. (rlu)
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER Granting Defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss. The Court Grants Defendant's motion to dismiss, Denies its request for reasonable attorney's fees, and Dismisses the First Amended Complaint with leave to amend. The Court further Dis misses Plaintiffs' claims under the CLRA, and for money had and received and money paid. Plaintiffs have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to file a Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 5/14/2013. (rlu)(jrd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Similasan Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim Allen
Represented By: Ronald Marron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Similasan Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Similasan AG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?