Hupp v. San Diego County District Attorney et al
| Paul Hupp |
| San Diego County District Attorney, San Diego County Office of Assigned Counsel, San Diego County Superior Court, San Diego County Sheriff's Department, San Diego Police Department, Jeffrey Howard Freedman, John Sargent Meyer, James Patrick Romo, Theodore Stephen Drcar, Charlie Wetzel, William Kiernan, P. Meyer and ROES |
| 3:2012cv00492 |
| February 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Riverside |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
307
ORDER Granting 295 Defendants County of San Diego and Joseph Cargel's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 11/9/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
306
ORDER Denying 300 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 11/6/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
293
ORDER Granting 292 Defendants County of San Diego and Joseph Cargel's Ex Parte Application to File Answer and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The stay in this matter is lifted; Defendants are instructed to file an Answer and Motion fo r Judgment on the Pleadings within three (3) days of the electronic docketing of this Order; and The Court takes judicial notice of the following documents: Exhibit A: Opinion of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District of California, Divisio n One, Case No. D064053 (The People v. Paul Hupp) filed 1/8/15; and Exhibit B: Docket (Register of Actions) for Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District of California, Division One, Case No. D064053 (The People v. Paul Hupp). Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/20/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
289
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice 273 Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss and Vacating Motion Hearing Date set for September 19, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/18/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
278
ORDER: (1) Granting 204 Defendants City of San Diego and Raymond Wetzel's Motion for Summary Judgment; (2) Denying 274 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike; (3) Vacating Motion Hearing. The Court Vacates the motion hearing set to hear this matter on July 25, 2014. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the City of San Diego and Raymond Wetzel from the docket. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 7/21/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
267
ORDER: (1) Denying (Doc. 261 ) Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration; and (2) Discharging Order to Show Cause (Doc. 256 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 6/24/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
259
ORDER: (1) Denying 154 Motion to Compel Discovery from San Diego County, James Patrick Romo, and Peter Myers; (2) Denying as Moot 160 Motion for Protective Order on Behalf of Defendants County of San Diego, James Romo and Peter Myers. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 6/3/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
257
ORDER: (1)Granting 203 Defendants' Ex Parte Application to Modify the Scheduling Order; and (2) Granting Defendants' Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Deposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 5/13/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
251
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part 152 Motion to Compel Discovery From City of San Diego and Raymond Wetzel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 4/9/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
239
ORDER Granting 127 Defendant County of San Diego's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Court Grants Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Plaintiff's Fourth Cause of Action. It is Ordered that the Fourth C ause of Action in Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint as alleged against Defendant County of San Diego is Dismissed With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/4/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
229
ORDER: (1) Denying 198 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Expert Witness Christopher J. Ellis; (2) Granting 211 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike "Exhibit 2" to the Declaration of Raymond Wetzel in Support of Defendants City of San D iego and Raymond Wetzel's Motion for Summary Judgment; (3) Vacating Motion Hearing. The motion hearing set to hear both motions for January 31, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. is Vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 1/30/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
221
ORDER Granting 123 Defendants County of San Diego and James Romo's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court Grants Defendants James Romo and County of San Diego's motion for summary judgment on all causes of action alleged against James Romo and the San Diego District Attorney's Office as a San Diego County agency in Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 1/9/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
159
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 133 Plaintiff's Emergency Ex Parte Motion to Quash Raymond Wetzel Subpoenas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 9/25/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER Directing Plaintiff To File Supplemental Briefing. Set Deadlines as to 107 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Fourth Amended Complaint. Supplemental briefing due by 1/23/2013. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 1/3/2013.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 55 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint; denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 55 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Court grants Pla leave to file a third amended complaint. Pla shall file third amended complaint by 9/10/2012. Once third amended complaint is filed, Clerk shall issue summons on new Defendants the City of San Diego, Raymond Wetzel aka Charlie Wetzel, the City of Beaumont and Joseph Cargel. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 8/21/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 31 Motion to Set Aside Default Against SD Sheriff's Dept. and Kiernan; denying 39 Motion to Set Aside Default; granting 42 Joint Motion to Set Aside Default Against SD OAC and Myers; denying in part 28 Motion for Defau lt Judgment. Court sets aside the Clerk's entry of default against Dfts SD OAC, SD Sheriff's Dept, Kiernan and Myers. Court orders Dfts SD OAC and Myers to file a responsive pleading or motion to dismiss (or both) within 30 days of the date this Order is filed. Court specifically denies Pla's motion for default judgment against Dfts SD OSC, SD Sheriff's Dept., Kiernan and Myers. Pla ordered to show cause by 8/6/2012 why entry of default against Dfts SDPD and Wetzel should not be aside for failure to properly serve them w/ the complaint and summons and his motion for default judgment against them be denied. Pla granted 60 days from the date this Order is filed to perfect service upon Dfts SD Sheriff's Dept and Kierna n in accordance w/ requirement of FRCP 4. Pla is cautioned that failure to perfect service upon the two Dfts will result in their dismissal. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 7/12/2012. (Copy of Order mailed William Kiernan) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 20 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 4/26/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
