Ortegoza et al v. Kho et al
Portia Ortegoza and Frank Ortegoza |
Peter Kho, M.D., Does 1-25 and United States of America |
3:2012cv00529 |
March 1, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Larry Alan Burns |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 ORDER denying 82 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/24/2014. (sjt) |
Filing 58 ORDER granting 41 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiffs shall file their TAC as it was attached to their motion by May 20, 2013. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 5/16/2013. (sjt) |
Filing 40 ORDER Re: 32 Order to Show Cause. The Court finds that Mrs. Ortegozas SAC superseded Plaintiffs FAC, rendering that FAC non-existent. In addition, the Court hereby: TERMINATES Plaintiffs separate pending motions for leave to file amended complaints 33 , 34 ; and ORDERS Plaintiffs to file a single consolidated motion for leave to file a consolidated Third Amended Complaint, with a consolidated Proposed Third Amended Complaint attached to that motion. If Plaintiffs are unable or unwilling to seek leave to file a Third Amended Complaint by November 26, 2012, then the Court will dismiss this action in its entirety without prejudice. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 10/23/2012.(sjt)(jrd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.