808 Holdings, LLC v. Collective of January 1, 2012 Sharing Hash E37917C8EEB4585E6421358FF32F29CD63C23C91ON et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District 808 Holdings, LLC v. Collective of January 1, 2012 Sharing Hash E37917C8EEB4585E6421358FF32F29CD63C23C91ON et al

808 Holdings, LLC v. Collective of January 1, 2012 Sharing Hash E37917C8EEB4585E6421358FF32F29CD63C23C91ON et al

Plaintiff:	808 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:	Collective of January 1, 2012 Sharing Hash E37917C8EEB4585E6421358FF32F29CD63C23C91ON and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Case Number:	3:2012cv00532
Filed:	March 2, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Larry Alan Burns
Presiding Judge:	Bernard G. Skomal
Nature of Suit:	Copyrights
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 501
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 22, 2013	Filing 7 ORDER Overruling 6 Objections to Magistrate Judge's Orders filed by 808 Holdings, LLC.; Severing Does; and Dismissing Action Against All DOES Except DOE 1. The Claims against all DOES (2 through 20, inclusive) are Dismissed without prejudice. To the extent Judge Brooks's Order in 12-CV-186-MMA(RBB) authorized early discovery for five Doe defendants, Plaintiff may now seek early discovery for one Doe defendant in light of the instant Order. Judge Brooks's Orders in all three related cases shall remain in effect in all other respects. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/5/2013. (Nunc Pro Tunc to 3/5/2013)(leh) (leh)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 22, 2013

Filing 7 ORDER Overruling 6 Objections to Magistrate Judge's Orders filed by 808 Holdings, LLC.; Severing Does; and Dismissing Action Against All DOES Except DOE 1. The Claims against all DOES (2 through 20, inclusive) are Dismissed without prejudice. To the extent Judge Brooks's Order in 12-CV-186-MMA(RBB) authorized early discovery for five Doe defendants, Plaintiff may now seek early discovery for one Doe defendant in light of the instant Order. Judge Brooks's Orders in all three related cases shall remain in effect in all other respects. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/5/2013. (Nunc Pro Tunc to 3/5/2013)(leh) (leh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 808 Holdings, LLC v. Collective of January 1, 2012 Sharing Hash E37917C8EEB4585E6421358FF32F29CD63C23C91ON et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Collective of January 1, 2012 Sharing Hash E37917C8EEB4585E6421358FF32F29CD63C23C91ON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: 808 Holdings, LLC
Represented By:	Arthur Carvalho, JR
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?