Broadnax v. Allison
| Deshawn Broadnax |
| Kathleen Allison |
| 3:2012cv00560 |
| March 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Kings |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 36 Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability and granting 37 Petitioner's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. As Petitioner merely presents issues which were already considered and ruled upon by this Court, Petitioner's request for reconsideration is DENIED. The Court therefore declines to issue a certificate of appealability as to Claims One and Three. This decision does not alter in any way the Court's prior Order issuing a certificate of ap pealability limited to Claim Two... Accordingly, the Court finds no reason to deny Petitioner's ability to continue to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court therefore GRANTS Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/10/2013. (USCA Case Number 13-56134. Order electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER (1) Denying Request For Evidentiary Hearing; (2) Denying Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (3) Issuing a Limited Certificate of Appealability. Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is Denied, the First Amended Petition for a writ of habeas corpus is Denied, and a Certificate of Appealability is Issued limited to claim two. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 5/8/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Denying 8 MOTION for Stay and Abeyance filed by Deshawn Broadnax. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 10/26/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER: (1) Denying Application to Proceed in forma pauperis and (2) Dismissing case without prejudice and with leave to amend for Petitioner's failure to name a proper respondent, and state grounds for relief in the petition. In order to have th is case reopened, Petitioner must submit no later than May 15, 2012, a copy of this Order with the $5.00 fee or with adequate proof of his inability to pay the fee and a First Amended Petition. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/9/12. (copy of Order and blank IFP form mailed to Petitioner)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lao)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Broadnax v. Allison | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Kathleen Allison | |
| Represented By: | Attorney General |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Deshawn Broadnax | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
