Akins v. San Diego Community College District et al
| Rodney E. Akins |
| San Diego Community College District, Victor Charles, Karen Owen, Penny Hedgecoth and DOES |
| 3:2012cv00576 |
| March 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William V. Gallo |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER Denying Plaintiff;s Ex Parte 91 Motion to Extend Time to Supplement and Correct Disclosures without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 11/20/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER Granting Defendants' 61 Motion to Dismiss in part and denying in part. Defendants' motion is Granted as to Counts One (First Amendment), Three (Cruel and Unusual Punishment under the Eighth Amendment), Four (Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment) and Five (Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment) and Denied as to Count Two (Illegal Search, Seizure, and Excessive Force under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments) against Defendant Officer Torres. Counts One , Three, Four, and Five are Dismissed without further leave to amend and all counts against Defendant Hedgecoth are Dismissed without leave to amend. No motions for reconsideration shall be entertained. Defendant Officer Torres shall file an answer to Count Two of the Plaintiff's FAC within 20 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 1/2/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER Granting Defendants' 48 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a fourth amended complaint within thirty (30) days. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 5/29/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 51 Ex Parte Motion for Appointment of Process Server. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 10/2/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Defendant's 38 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff shall have until August 30, 2013, to file a Third Amended Complaint, and Defendants shall have until September 13, 2013, to file an answer. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/26/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; Granting 11 Plaintiff's Motion Appoint Process Server; Granting 20 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs second amended complaint must be filed within 21 days of the date of this order. The Court further ORDERS that the United States Marshal shall serve a summons and a copy of the Second Amended Complaint upon Defendants as directed by Plaintiff on U.S. Marshal Form 285, with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. Plaintiff shall have ninety (90) days from the filing of the Second Amended Complaint in which to serve defendants.Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 1/2/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjt)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Granting 2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing case. The Court Dismisses all claims based on the alleged events described in the forgoing paragraph without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff must submit any amended complaint within 45 days after the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 4/16/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
