Doe v. San Diego, City of et al
| Jane Doe |
| William Lansdowne, Does, San Diego, City of, Anthony Arevalos, Kevin Friedman and David Bejarano |
| 3:2012cv00689 |
| March 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M. Anello |
| David H. Bartick |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
366
ORDER Granting Supervisor Defendants' Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) 344 . Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendants William Lansdowne, David Bejarano, Rudy Tai, Danny Hollister, Kevin Friedman, Victoria Binkerd, Robert Kanaski, Max Verduzco, and Jorge Guevara on all claims and issues alleged against them herein pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/20/2014. (vam)
|
|
Filing
353
ORDER granting in part and denying in part the Media's 327 Motion to Intervene and 327 Motion to Unseal Court Records. Court orders the unsealing of the majority of the documents filed in conjunction with the summary judgment motions previ ously decided by this Court. The parties shall perform any necessary redactions as referenced in this Order and file unsealed versions of all pertinent documents within 5 days of this Order. Clerk is instructed to unseal all documents as referenced in this Order which do not require redacting and which may be unsealed in their entirety. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/14/2014. (jah). Modified on 5/14/2014 - Edited to correct filing deadline. Regenerated NEF (jah).
|
|
Filing
231
DISCOVERY ORDER. It is hereby Ordered that Plaintiffs motion to compel disclosure of the documents submitted to the Court for in camera review is Granted in Part. Plaintiffs request for oral argument 174 is Denied as moot. Plaintiffs motion to comp el an additional session of Detective Stacee Botsfords deposition is Granted. Plaintiffs request for sanctions concerning the Botsford deposition is Denied. Plaintiffs motion to compel the disputed Rule 30(b)(6) depositions is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 12/13/2013. (sjt)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER Resolving 115 Joint Motion For Determination of Discovery Dispute Regarding Various Issues. It is hereby ordered that Defendants' request that the depositions of Plaintiff and Brad T. be re-opened is Denied. The deposition of Gerald Sand ers shall not go forward until after the district judge issues a ruling on Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint. Defendants' request that the Court sanction Plaintiff by striking her expert designation of Detective Lori Adams is Denied. By 8/9/2013, Plaintiff shall serve Defendants with an amended expert designation. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 8/1/2013. (leh)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER Resolving 99 Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute Re: Defendants' Subpoena to Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless. It is hereby ordered that the City's subpoena to Verizon is Quashed. It is further ordered that Counsel for the City shall serve Verizon with a copy of this Order by 6/4/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 5/28/2013. (leh)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER Resolving 90 Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute Re: Plaintiff Jane Doe's Amended Notice of Videotaped Deposition of Defendant Arevalos. It is hereby Ordered that the parties may depose Defendant Anthony Arevalos on 5/20 /2013, beginning at 8:00 AM at the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison. The Deposition may be videotaped. The entire transcript and videotape of Defendant Arevalos' 5/20/2013 videotaped deposition shall be designated as "confidential" pursuant to the Court's 3/8/2013 Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 4/22/2013. (leh)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER Granting 84 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. It is hereby Ordered that Plaintiff shall file her proposed Third Amended Complaint by 4/22/2013. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/18/2013. (leh)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER Resolving 69 Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute Regarding Terms of Protective Order. The Court's protective order will be issued in a separate order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 3/8/2013.(rlu) per chambers, terminated ECF No. 69 on 3/8/2013 (rlu).
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Denying 41 Motion to Stay Civil Proceedings. For the reasons stated herein, the Court concludes that a stay is not necessary or appropriate. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/7/2012. (leh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
