Cota v. City of San Diego et al
| Javier Cota |
| San Diego, City of, William Landsowne, Boyd Long, Ariel Savage, Justin Mattly, CM Sarot, Dan Christman, Bret Righthouse and Does 1-50 |
| 3:2012cv00998 |
| April 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John A. Houston |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 54 Motion for Summary Judgment. Court dismisses with prejudice Pla's claims 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 against all Dfts. Pla's claim one survives against Dfts Mattly and Savage, and claims 4 and 5 survive against Officers Mattly and Savage and the City. All claims are dismissed with prejudice against all other Dfts. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 10/29/2014. (jah)
|
|
Filing
57
TRANSFER ORDER. It is hereby ordered that this case be transferred from the calendar of the Honorable Nita L. Stormes, to the calendar of the Honorable Jill L. Burkhardt, for all further proceedings. All conference or hearing dates set before Magist rate Judge Stormes, if any, are VACATED and will be rescheduled before Magistrate Judge Burkhardt. Any dates set before any district judge remain unchanged. The new case number is 12cv998. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 03/28/14.(jcj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
