Velasco v. SEI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
| Anthony Velasco |
| SEI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
| 3:2012cv01060 |
| April 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Class Action Complaint is DENIED. (Doc. 22 ). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/5/2013. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER: The Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. (Doc. 14 ). No later than fourteen (14) days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff may file the proposed first amended complaint which is attached to the Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/25/2013. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants (Doc. 5 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint, accompanied by the proposed amended complaint, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. If no motion is filed, the case will be dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk of the Court will close the case. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 10/28/2012. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
