Wolcott v. Meuller et al
| Alan W. Wolcott |
| DOES, The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert Meuller, Eric Holder, Kieth Slotter and The United States Attorney General's Office |
| 3:2012cv01282 |
| May 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER Granting 29 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is Granted as to Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, labeled as Count 1 and 2 in the Third Amended Complaint, Without Leave to Amend; Defenda nts' Motion to Dismiss is Granted as to Plaintiff's claim for bad faith With Leave to Amend; Amended complaint due by January 30, 2014; and The hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss set for January 3, 2014, is Vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 12/20/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (srm)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 18 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's first and second causes of action are Dismissed With Prejudice. Plaintiff's third cause of action is Dismissed Without Prejudice. The hearing date set for March 1, 2013 is Vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 2/25/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
