Brummett et al v. San Diego, County of et al
| Estate of Daniel Sisson, Shaunda Brummett and Greg Sisson |
| San Diego, County of, San Diego County Sheriff's Department, William D. Gore and DOES 1-50, inclusive |
| 3:2012cv01428 |
| June 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
AMENDED JUDGMENT. This action came to trial on 10/28/2014. Court orders judgment for the Plaintiff The Estate of Daniel Sisson. Pla's 1st cause of action for Deliberat Indifference in violation of Daniel Sisson's rights under 42 USC 1983 ag ainst Mary Abiaro and Evelyn Morales is entered. Pla's 2nd cause of action that Dft County of San Diego's custom and practice regarding its Heroin Detoxification Policy is in violation of Daniel Sisson's rights under 42 USC 1983 agains t Dft County of San Diego is entered. Pla's 3rd cause of action that Dft Ciunty of San Diego's Hourly Security Check Policy is in violation of Daniel Sisson's rights under 42 USC 1983, against Dft County of San Diego is entered. Pla� 39;s 4th cause of action that Dft County of San Diego's Failure to Train its Jail Staff is in violation fo daniel Sisson's rights under 42 USC 1983, against Dft County of of San Diego is entered. Jury's Verdict dated 11/11/2014 against Dft County of San Diego in favor of The Estate of Daniel Sisson for $3,000,000.00 is entered. Court orders Judgment for Defendants as follows: 1. Judgment in favor of County of San Diego, Mary Abiaro and Evelyn Morales as to all claims brought by Plaintiffs Shaundra Brummett and Greg is entered, 2. Judgment in favor of Noel Sheahan and Michael Fleek as to all claims brought by Plaintiffs Shaunda Brummett, Greg Sisson and The Estate of Daniel Sisson is entered, 3. Judgment in favor of Ellen Guadalupe as to all claims brought by Plaintiffs Shaunda Brummett, Greg Sisson and The Estate of Daniel Sisson is entered, This Amended Judgment vacates and supersedes the Judgment entered on 11/13/2014. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 11/14/2014. (jah)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting in Part 6 Motion to Dismiss: The First, Second, and Fifth causes of action against Sheriff Gore and the County of San Diego are Dismissed Without Prejudice. These two' Defendants' request to dismiss the third claim is Den ied as Moot, because that claim is not brought against them. Sheriff Gore's request to dismiss the fourth claim against him is Denied as Moot, because that claim is not brought against him. Sheriff Gore's request to dismiss the sixth claim as against him is Denied. If Plaintiffs wish to amend their complaint, they must do so within 28 calendar days of the date this order is issued. If Plaintiffs do not amend, the claims the Court has dismissed without prejudice will remain dismissed and will be deemed abandoned. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/25/2013. (leh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
