Rogers v. County of San Diego, California et al
| Brian F. Rogers |
| County of San Diego, California, San Diego County Sheriff's Office and Lantz Lewis |
| 3:2012cv01684 |
| July 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER granting Defendants' 18 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice without leave to amend. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 4/15/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting Defendant San Diego County's 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting Defendant Lantz Lewis's 9 Motion to Dismiss. Pla's claims against Dft Judge Lewis are dismissed w/ prejudice. Pla's claim s against San Diego County are dismissed w/o prejudice. Pla is granted leave to file an amended complaint by 1/28/2013. Should Pla file an amended complaint, it may only include claims against San Diego County and shall not include claims against Judge Lewis. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 1/2/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
