Newell v. County of San Diego et al
Plaintiff: Timothy J Newell
Defendant: County of San Diego, Elizabeth Palmer and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 3:2012cv01696
Filed: July 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Presiding Judge: Barbara Lynn Major
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER Granting 36 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Final Judgment in favor of Defendants County of San Diego and Elizabeth Palmer and against Plaintiff Timothy J. Newell on each of Plaintiff 's causes of action for (1) violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (2) civil conspiracy; (3) negligent hiring, training, retention and supervision/unlawful policy, custom or habit; (4) intentional infliction of emotional distress; and (5) false arrest. Plaintiff shall take nothing by this action. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 5/28/2014. (srm)
October 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER Denying 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/15/2013. (srm)(jrd)
September 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Denying 27 Without Prejudice Defendant's Request For Court Assistance In Coordinating The Depositions Of Lisa Kahn, Asif Kahn, And Amir Kahn. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 9/5/13. (dlg)
May 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER Denying 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel the Production of Defendant Palmer's Performance Evaluations. Defendants are ORDERED to retrieve from the Court's chambers all documents submitted for in camera review within five (5) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 5/8/2013. (srm)
April 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part 16 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 4/8/2013. (srm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newell v. County of San Diego et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy J Newell
Represented By: Eugene Sydeny Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of San Diego
Represented By: David L Brodie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elizabeth Palmer
Represented By: David L Brodie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?