Cox v. Raymond Interior Systems
Shane Cox |
Raymond Interior Systems |
3:2012cv01722 |
July 11, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
David H. Bartick |
John A. Houston |
Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER Dismissing Complaint Without Prejudice and Denying as Moot 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; and Denying as Moot 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 8/8/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cox v. Raymond Interior Systems | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shane Cox | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Raymond Interior Systems | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.