Franke v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc. et al
| Donald K. Franke |
| Bridgepoint Education, Inc., Andrew S. Clark, Daniel J. Devine and Jane McAuliffe |
| 3:2012cv01737 |
| July 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jeffrey T. Miller |
| William McCurine |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 70 Amended Motion to Certify Class. Court appoints City of Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund and Teamsters Local 677 Health Services & Insurance Plan as class representatives, and appoints their counsel, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, as class counsel. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 1/15/2015. (jah)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER denying as moot and without prejudice 59 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 8/8/2014. (av1)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER re 61 Discovery Disputes,. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 8/6/14.(av1)
|
|
Filing
54
TRANSFER ORDER. It is hereby ordered that this case be transferred from the calendar of the Honorable Nita L. Stormes, to the calendar of the Honorable Jill L. Burkhardt, for all further proceedings. All conference or hearing dates set before Magist rate Judge Stormes, if any, are VACATED and will be rescheduled before Magistrate Judge Burkhardt. Any dates set before any district judge remain unchanged. The new case number is 12cv1737 JM (JLB). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 03/28/14.(jcj)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 28 Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Complaint for Violation of Federal Securities Laws. Court grants Dfts' motion to dismiss with leave to amend for the alleged misrepresentations relating to Ashford's quality of education, the WASC accreditation process, and Bridgepoint's financial forecasts. Court denies Dfts' motion to dismiss for the alleged misrepresentations concerning Ashford's persistence rates. Court dismisses Pla's Section 20A claim, but not Pla's Section 20(a) claim. Pla must filed any amended complaint by 10/31/2013. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 9/13/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
