Protective Life Insurance Company v. Alvarez et al
Plaintiff: Protective Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Ana Berta Alvarez, Monica Figueroa and Theresa Hawkins
Case Number: 3:2012cv01749
Filed: July 16, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Michael M. Anello
Presiding Judge: David H. Bartick
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 DEFAULT JUDGMENT and ORDER Granting 31 Motion for Default Judgment and Release of Life Insurance Proceeds. It is hereby Ordered that Default Judgment is entered against Defendants Ana Berta Alvarez, Monica Figueroa, and Monica Figueroa as Admini strator of the Estate of Teresa Cabrales Alvarez, and in favor of Theresa Hawkins as Administrator of the Estate of David Alvarez. The Court finds that Theresa Hawkins as Administrator of the Estate of David Alvarez is entitled to all proceeds of t he life insurance policy pertaining to decedent David Alvarez in this action, and on deposit with this Court in this action. The Clerk of Court shall release the remaining $97,661.16, including all interest, to Defendant Theresa Hawkins as Administrator of the Estate of David Alvarez. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/21/2013. (cc: Financial Dept) (leh)
February 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Granting 22 Motion for Order of Discharge; Granting in Part 22 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court hereby orders Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2361, Protective is hereby discharged from all liability on or arising out of life insurance poli cy No. 00200223689 and the rights and obligations of the parties to this action with respect to any and all proceeds under the policy. The policy is void and of not further force and effect. From the money that was deposited by Protective with the Cl erk of this Court, Protective is awarded $6,160.76 as costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred in bringing and maintaining the present action. Protective is dismissed from this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 2/11/2013. (leh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Protective Life Insurance Company v. Alvarez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ana Berta Alvarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monica Figueroa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Theresa Hawkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Protective Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Andrea K. Anapolsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?