Salvador v. Alvarado Parkway Hospital

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District Salvador v. Alvarado Parkway Hospital

Salvador v. Alvarado Parkway Hospital

Plaintiff:	Amina Salvador
Defendant:	Alvarado Parkway Hospital
Case Number:	3:2012cv01855
Filed:	July 26, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Jan M. Adler
Presiding Judge:	Larry Alan Burns
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 11, 2012	Filing 8 ORDER granting plaintiff's 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, should she elect to file one, must be received by the Court no later than Monday, November 19, 2012. If Plaintiff elects not to file an Amended Complaint by November 19, 2012, this case shall remain dismissed as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) without any further Order by the Court. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 10/8/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)
August 10, 2012	Filing 5 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, denying without prejudice 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed in which to file a First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/9/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 11, 2012

Filing 8 ORDER granting plaintiff's 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, should she elect to file one, must be received by the Court no later than Monday, November 19, 2012. If Plaintiff elects not to file an Amended Complaint by November 19, 2012, this case shall remain dismissed as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) without any further Order by the Court. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 10/8/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)

August 10, 2012

Filing 5 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, denying without prejudice 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed in which to file a First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/9/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salvador v. Alvarado Parkway Hospital
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amina Salvador
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Alvarado Parkway Hospital
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?