Aguilar v. Smart Balance, Inc. et al
Maria Aguilar |
Smart Balance, Inc. and GFA Brands, Inc. |
3:2012cv01862 |
July 27, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
M. James Lorenz |
Bernard G. Skomal |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 ORDER denying Defendants' 82 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 4/16/2015. (jah) |
Filing 74 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 43 45 Motion to for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint; Granting Plaintiff's 62 Motion for Leave to Further Amend the Proposed Second Amended Complaint. The Court Denies without prejudice Plaintiff 9;s request for a protective order barring Ms. Aguilar from being deposed. Any motion for a protective order shall be raised before the Magistrate Judge. The Second Amended Complaint shall be filed within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/2/2014. (rlu) |
Filing 72 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 69 Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order. Good cause has not been shown by Defendants to compel Plaintiff's deposition or supplemental responses and their requests are Denied. The May 9, 2014 deadline for fact discovery is hereby Vacated. The parties are ordered to contact Judge Skomal's chambers within three (3) court days of receiving a ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Further Amend the Second Amended Complaint in order to schedule a telephonic Status Conference regarding case management. The telephonic status conference presently scheduled for April 18, 2014is also Vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 3/25/2014. (rlu) |
Filing 28 ORDER Denying Defendant's 10 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants shall file an answer to the First Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 6/10/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.