Vu et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Phong Thi Vu, Cuc Thi Truong, Hue Thi Nguyen and Hong Xuan Bui |
| Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Does 1-10, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service and Department of Homeland Security |
| 3:2012cv01933 |
| August 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Naturalization Application |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER (1) Granting 12 Motion to Dismiss Complaint as Moot; (2) Denying 26 Motion to Amend Complaint. The Court agrees with the Government that subject matter jurisdiction is lacking to entertain any of the claims asserted by Petitioners, either in the original or the proposed amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court grants the Government's motion to dismiss. The proposed amended complaint does not, in fact, cure any of the defects identified by the Government. Accordingly, the Court denies Petitioners' motion for leave to amend. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/30/2013. (jao)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting 2 3 4 5 Petitioners Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. US Marshal shall effect service of complaint. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/21/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jao)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
