Azco Biotech, Inc. et al v. Qiagen, N.V. et al
| Azco Biotech Inc. and J Adams |
| Qiagen, N.V., Steven Gordon, Jingyue Jiu, Jerzy Olejnik, Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. and Does 1-50, inclusive |
| 3:2012cv02599 |
| October 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| David H. Bartick |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend 74 , 88 ). Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 3/13/2015. (knb)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER Granting Defendant's 91 Motion to Strike Errata to Deposition of Plaintiff J Adams. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 1/23/2015. (knb)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER: (1) Granting Plaintiffs' 19 Amended Motion for Order Allowing Sur-Reply; (2) Denying as Moot Plaintiffs' 18 Motion for Order Allowing Sur-Reply; and (3) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' 10 Motion to Dismiss. Any amendment to the complaint, if any, must be filed, within 21 days from the date this Order is filed. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 8/19/2013. (knb)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' 23 Application to Set Rule 26(f) Discovery Conference, Permit Initiation of Discovery and Set Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 6/26/2013. (knb)(jrd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
