Imagenetix, Inc. v. Frutarom USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Imagenetix, Inc.
Defendant: Frutarom USA, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2012cv02823
Filed: November 21, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Gonzalo P. Curiel
Presiding Judge: William McCurine
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Supplemental 80 Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Defendant's 82 Motion to Strike. The Court also grants Plaintiff's request for leave to file an amended complaint to add breach of express warranty. Plaintiff shall file an amended c omplaint within five days of the filing of this Order. The hearing set for March 24, 2017 shall be vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/22/17. (dlg)
December 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER Denying 35 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting in part and Denying in part 45 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and Staying Case. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 12/9/2013. (srm)
June 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Granting 25 Defendant's Ex Parte Application. The Court Denies 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as premature and Directs the parties to contact the chambers of Magistrate Judge McCurine to conduct expedited d iscovery in preparation for the issues in Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. The magistrate judge shall issue a scheduling order concerning expedited discovery and a scheduling order for a renewed motion for partial summary judgment by Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 6/18/2013. (srm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Imagenetix, Inc. v. Frutarom USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Imagenetix, Inc.
Represented By: Aimee Doyle
Represented By: Gregory P Olson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frutarom USA, Inc.
Represented By: Rebecca Grace Church
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?