Shortal et al v. Hessgen, Inc. et al
| Joseph Shortal, John Stamatis, Paul Barden, Kenneth Vaughan and Michael Simon |
| Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Brian Hess, Andy Mills and Hessgen, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv02845 |
| November 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER: Hessgen, Inc. and Brian Hess's Crossclaim against Andy Mills and Jack Mott is dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. 16 ). The Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution filed by Jack Mott is denied as moot. (Doc. 86 ). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/13/2014. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER: The Motion for Entry of Default on the Complaint Against Defendants Hessgen, Inc. and Brian Hess filed by Plaintiffs Joseph Shortal, John Stamatis, Paul Barden, Kenneth Vaughan, and Michael Simon (Doc. 53 ) is denied without prejudice as to D efendant Brian Hess, and granted as to Defendant Hessgen, Inc. Within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, Brian Hess shall notify the Court as to why he did not comply with the Court's 6/20/2013 Order, and as to whether he will proceed pr o se or retain new counsel. If Brian Hess fails to notify the Court within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, he may be subject to default proceedings. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 10/15/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; per Order, this Order was served on Defts Brian Hess and Hessgen, Inc. at the addresses indicated on the Order.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Granting 40 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, LJLG shall serve a copy of this Order on Brian Hess and Hessgen, Inc, and file a certificate of that service with the Court. Within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, Brian Hess shall notify the Court as to whether he will proceed pro se or retain new counsel. Accordingly, Hessgen, Inc. is hereby notified that it has sixty (60) days from the date this Order is filed to obtain new co unsel and have counsel file a notice of appearance. Hessgen, Inc. is also notified that if it fails to obtain new counsel and have counsel file a notice of appearance, it may be subject to default proceedings. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/20/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (jao).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
