Jafari v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
Reza Jafari |
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and DOES 1 through 50 |
3:2012cv02982 |
December 14, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Ruben B. Brooks |
Larry Alan Burns |
Contract: Other |
12 U.S.C. ยง 1819 FDIC: Corporate Powers |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 132 ORDER denying FDIC-R's 110 Motion to Dismiss and granting FDIC-R's 110 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 6/8/15. (kas) |
Filing 126 ORDER denying without prejudice 122 Application to File Documents Under Seal. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/23/15. (kas) |
Filing 90 ORDER denying as moot plaintiffs' 80 Motion to Compel. The Court reserves its ruling on Plaintiffs' request for reasonable expenses in bringing the motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 12/5/14. (kas) |
Filing 57 ORDER denying FDIC's 48 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/17/14. (kaj) |
Filing 55 ORDER granting third party defendant's 19 Motion to Dismiss. Heritage's motion to dismiss the FDIC's breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and breach of contract claims is GRANTED. Those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It follows that the FDICs claims for implied contractual indemnity and declaratory relief also fail, and they are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/4/14. (kaj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.