Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
| Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and SCR Pharmatop |
| Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC |
| Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC |
| Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| 3:2013cv00139 |
| January 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Dana M. Sabraw |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
319
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 218 Ex Parte MOTION for Sanctions by Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC. As provided herein, Plaintiff Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc., must reimburse Defendant Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC, for reasonable costs and fees incurred in investigating and bringing before the Court the breach of the Protective Order. The Court declines to impose a further sanction at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 7/8/14. (Dembin, Mitchell)
|
|
Filing
163
ORDER denying 145 Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute re: Assertion of Attorney-Client Privilege. For the reasons expressed in the attached Order, the Court finds that German privilege law applies in this instance and that, with a few exceptions based upon in camera review, Defendant properly has asserted privilege. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 2/3/14. (Dembin, Mitchell)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
