Horton v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
| Cory Horton |
| Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC |
| 3:2013cv00307 |
| February 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Sacramento |
| William V. Gallo |
| John A. Houston |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
307
ORDER Granting 305 Plaintiffs' Motion to Approve Payment of Cost Incurred in Class Settlement. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion to approve payment of costs incurred but overlooked is GRANTED. From the Cash Fund, JND Administr ation shall remit $33,679.20 to AB Data in full satisfaction of all outstanding invoices related to this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on Plaintiff's motion set for June 9, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. is VACATED. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 6/4/2021. (tcf)
|
|
Filing
303
ORDER (1) Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Dismissing Class Plaintiffs' Claims (Doc. No. 299 ) (2) Granting Motion for Attornys' Fees, Costs and Incentive Awards (Doc. No. 297 ). Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 10/13/2020. (jrm)
|
|
Filing
291
ORDER Vacating Hearing. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the motion is taken under submission without oral argument and the hearing set for 3/23/2020, at 2:30 p.m. is VACATED. The Court will issue an order in due course. As such, the Parties' Joint Motion to Appear Telephonically for the 3/23/2020, hearing, (doc. nos. 75 , 290 ) is DISMISSED AS MOOT. However, in the event a hearing is required at a later time, the Court will allow the Parties to appear telephonically. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 3/17/2020. (tcf)
|
|
Filing
288
ORDER on Joint Motion to Continue Deadline to File Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement and Vacating Status Conference. (ECF No. 284 ) Motions due by 2/21/2020. The Court finds that good cause supports the Joint Motion and thus GRANTS the Motion in its entirety. Accordingly, the Parties are ORDERED to file, no later than February 21, 2020, their Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement. The Court underscores the importance of and necessity to meet this deadline, as th e Court will not entertain any additional continuance requests absent a clear showing of good cause. To that end, the Court hereby VACATES the January 29, 2020 telephonic status conference, as the need for the conference has been obviated by the Court's instant ruling. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 1/28/2020. (tcf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Horton v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cory Horton | |
| Represented By: | Tammy Hussin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
