Moore v. Tri-City Hospital Foundation et al
| Brenda Moore |
| Tri-City Healthcare District, Dr. Beth A Zelonis, Tri-City Hospital Foundation, Dr. Cary R. Mells and Dr. Randall Browning |
| 3:2013cv00341 |
| February 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER (1) Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; and (2) Dismissing Complaint Without Prejudice. IT IS ORDERED that: Plaintiff's motion to proceed IFP is granted. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failing to st ate a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b). Plaintiff is granted forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed in which to file an Amended Complaint which cures all t he deficiencies of pleading noted above. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint must be complete in itself without reference to the previous pleading. Defendants not named and all claims not re-alleged in the Amended Complaint will be considered waived. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 6/6/2013.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jao)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
