Swortwood et al v. Tenedora de Empresas, S.A. de C.V. et al
||Francisco Martinez de Velasco Cortina, Smartrac, N.V., Tenedora de Empresas, S.A. de C.V., Neology, Inc. and does 1 through 10, inclusive
||Donald R. Swortwood, Letitia H. Swotwood, Scott Pancoast and Benjamin Greenspan
||February 13, 2013
||California Southern District Court
||San Diego Office
||Barbara Lynn Major
||Barry Ted Moskowitz
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 8, 2014
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 95 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs may amend their Complaint only to add allegations regarding Tenedora's alleged use of Neology funds to purchase the ChinaVest shares. Plaintiffs must electronically file their TAC within 10 days of the entry of this Order. The parties should address Tenedora's derivative claim argument in their briefs on the motion for preliminary injunction. The Court grants Plaintiffs leave to file a reply brief that is an additional 10 pages long (20 pages total) to respond to Tenedora's derivative claim argument. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/8/2014. (rlu)
|March 6, 2014
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Plaintiffs' 64 Motion to Compel Production of Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 3/6/2014. (rlu)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.