Robanda International, Inc. v. Parkinson et al
Plaintiff: Robanda International, Inc.
Defendant: Camelot Hair Care Products, LLC ("Camelot"), Nina Parkinson, Plasticos Vandux De Colombia, S.A. and Does 1-20, inclusive
Case Number: 3:2013cv00490
Filed: March 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: Barbara Lynn Major
Presiding Judge: Barry Ted Moskowitz
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER Re: Order to Show Cause. Since Plaintiff is barred by licensee estoppel until December 1, 2013 from challenging the license agreement with Defendant Parkinson, and Defendant Parkinson is an indispensable party to the lawsuit, the Court hereby Dismisses the case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/29/2013.(rlu)
August 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER Denying 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; and Requiring Plaintiff to Show Cause Why Complaint Should Not Be Dismissed. It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff shall show cause as to why the Complaint should not be dismissed with out prejudice due to licensee estoppel. Defendant's reply brief (ECF No. 11 ) is taken to state its position. Plaintiff must file any response to the OSC by 8/22/2013. Defendant must file any reply by 8/28/2013. The hearing date for the OSC is set for 8/30/2013 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 15B. No personal appearances are required, and there will be no oral argument unless requested by the Court. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/6/2013. (leh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robanda International, Inc. v. Parkinson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Camelot Hair Care Products, LLC ("Camelot")
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nina Parkinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Plasticos Vandux De Colombia, S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robanda International, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey Paul Alpert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?