Talevski v. Regents of The University of California et al
| Anita Talevski |
| Regents of The University of California and Does 1 through 10 |
| 3:2013cv00958 |
| April 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Jeffrey T. Miller |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 24 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court denies the motion on whether Defendants violated the Rehabilitation Act by dismissing Plaintiff from the Program. This liability issue, in turn, will be determine d by the question of whether Plaintiff violated the Code, the sole remaining genuine issue of material fact following the court's consideration of these motion papers. The court also partially grants the motion to the extent Plaintiff claims that Defendant failed to accommodate her disability. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 4/27/2015. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Granting Defendant Regents of the University of California's 3 Motion to Dismiss. Court grants Dft's motion in its entirety. This action will proceed only on the Rehabilitation Act claim. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 8/13/2013.(jah)(jrd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
