Hernandez v. Paramo et al

Hernandez v. Paramo et al

Petitioner:	Joel Richard Hernandez
Respondent:	Daniel Paramo and Jessica Blonien
Case Number:	3:2013cv01217
Filed:	May 21, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Roger T. Benitez
Presiding Judge:	Barbara Lynn Major
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 28, 2014	Filing 24 ORDER: (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; (2) denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; (3) overruling objections; (4) denying certificate of appealability. The Court OVERRULES Petitioner's Objections. The Magistrate Judge's Report a nd Recommendation is READOPTED. The Petition is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability because the issues are not debatable among jurists of reason and there are no questions adequate to deserve encouragement. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 7/25/2014.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
March 24, 2014	Filing 13 ORDER: (1) Adopting 12 Report and Recommendation; (2) Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (3) Denying Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 3/21/2014.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 28, 2014

Filing 24 ORDER: (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; (2) denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; (3) overruling objections; (4) denying certificate of appealability. The Court OVERRULES Petitioner's Objections. The Magistrate Judge's Report a nd Recommendation is READOPTED. The Petition is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability because the issues are not debatable among jurists of reason and there are no questions adequate to deserve encouragement. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 7/25/2014.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)

March 24, 2014

Filing 13 ORDER: (1) Adopting 12 Report and Recommendation; (2) Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (3) Denying Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 3/21/2014.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hernandez v. Paramo et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Daniel Paramo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Jessica Blonien
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Joel Richard Hernandez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?