Critical Care Diagnostics, Inc. v. American Association For Clinical Chemistry, Inc. et al
| Critical Care Diagnostics, Inc. |
| Colby R. Ayers, Sandeep R. Das, James A. De Lemos, Lu Q. Chen, Nader Rifai, American Association For Clinical Chemistry, Inc., Anand Rohatgi and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive |
| 3:2013cv01308 |
| June 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| M. James Lorenz |
| William McCurine |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER granting in part 70 AAC's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 6/19/2014. (sjt)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER Granting Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice, Granting Defendant's 19 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; Denying as Moot 38 Motion to Dismiss and Denying as Moot Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 3/4/2014. (sjt)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER granting 30 Rafai's Motion to Strike ; and granting 37 AACC's Amended Motion to Strike. Defendants Rafai and AACC, as the prevailing defendant, are entitled to attorneys fees and costs. Defendants shall file their motions for attorneys fees and costs within 20 days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 2/18/2014. (sjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
