Smith v. Chau et al
| Carey Smith |
| G. Casian, John Chau and D. Morton |
| 3:2013cv01337 |
| June 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Gonzalo P. Curiel |
| William McCurine |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER (1) Dismissing Civil Action Without Prejudice For Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies Prior to Suit Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1997e(a); and (2) Denying Plaintiff's Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and For Appointment of Counsel as Moot (Docs. 6 , 7 , 13 ). The Clerk of Court shall enter a final dismissal of this action without prejudice and close the case. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/17/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Denying 7 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Case Without Prejudice Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). Plaintiff is Granted forty-five (45) days to pay the entire $350 filing fee and $50 administrative fee in full, or file a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 6/18/2013. Plaintiff provided new IFP Form. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
