McCarty et al v. United States of America et al
| Kayne McCarty and Amanda McCarty |
| United States of America, Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing LLC, Lincoln Military Housing Co., Rheem Manufacturing Co., Unitrol Electronics Inc. and Does 1 through 100 |
| 3:2013cv01602 |
| July 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Bernardino |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| William McCurine |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Venue |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER denying 72 Motion to Bifurcate Trial, granting 90 Motion to Substitute Attorney, and rescheduling Pretrial Conference. The pretrial conference for this case is currently scheduled for September 21, 2015. It's rescheduled for September 14, 2015 at 11:30 a.m.. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/19/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kas)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 83 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney for Robertshaw Controls Co. Attorney Brian A Rawers and Katherine T Weadock are withdrawn as counsel. Robertshaw is warned that, because it's an entity, it must appear through an attorney. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to serve a copy of this order onDefendant Robertshaw. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/16/15. (cc: Robertshaw Controls Co.) (kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
