American Shooting Center, Inc. v. Secfor International et al
| American Shooting Center, Inc. |
| Secfor International, Secfor International, LLC, Htpscourtse.com, Absolute Security, Inc., Absolute Protection Group Worldwide, Inc., APG, Keiko Arroyo and Patrick Richard Sweeney |
| 3:2013cv01847 |
| August 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER Granting 105 Motion to Dismiss. Kurokawa's motion to dismiss is Granted. Plaintiffs' claim for retroactive monetary relief (including the claims for declaratory relief, constructive trust, accounting, and disgorgement) against Kurokawa is Dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/22/2016. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER: (1) Granting in part and Denying in part 81 Motion by Defendants Miracosta College District and Linda Kurokawa for an Order Dismissing the Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Plaintiffs' claims against the MiraC osta Defendants are Dismissed with prejudice with the exception of Plaintiffs' claims against Linda Kurokawa, in her official capacity, for prospective injunctive relief; (2) Denying Jurisdictional Discovery (ECF No. 87 ); and (3) Granting in pa rt and Denying in part (ECF Nos. 78 , 79 ) Motion by Secfor International, et al., to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, Failure to State a Claim. The Court grants Plaintiffs leave to file a Second Amended Complai nt ("SAC") remedying the defects identified above. Plaintiffs must file their SAC within 30 days of the entry of this Order. If Plaintiffs do not file a SAC within 30 days, Defendants must file their answer to the FAC within 20 days after expiration of the 30 days. If Plaintiffs file a SAC, Defendants shall respond to the SAC within 30 days of the filing of the SAC. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 3/28/2016. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 51 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Counterclaim; and Granting 53 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Counterdefendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Counterclaim is Granted in p art and Denied in part. The second counterclaim (only to the extent it seeks damages), third counterclaim, fourth through tenth counterclaims, twelfth counterclaim, thirteenth counterclaim, fifteenth counterclaim, and sixteenth counterclaim are Dismi ssed for failure to state a claim. The Court will allow Counterclaimants to file a Third Amended Counterclaim remedying the deficiencies identified in this Order. If Counterclaimants choose to file a Third Amended Counterclaim, they must do so within 30 days of the entry of this Order. The Court Grants the motion by ASC and Recce for leave to file an Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs shall electronically file the Amended Complaint within 7 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 4/27/2015. (rlu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
