Conyers v. San Diego Sheriff's Department

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District Conyers v. San Diego Sheriff's Department

Conyers v. San Diego Sheriff's Department

Plaintiff:	Zackery T. Conyers
Defendant:	San Diego Sheriff's Department
Case Number:	3:2013cv02091
Filed:	September 6, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Larry Alan Burns
Presiding Judge:	Bernard G. Skomal
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 20, 2014	Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Watch Commander of GBDF, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the initial filing fee assessed in this Order, and shall forward the remainder of the &# 036;350 filing fee owed in by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account e xceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on the Watch Commander, George Bailey Detention Facility. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim. Plaintiff is granted forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed in which to file an Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/19/14. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cc: Watch Commander, George Bailey) (kaj)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 20, 2014

Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Watch Commander of GBDF, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the initial filing fee assessed in this Order, and shall forward the remainder of the &# 036;350 filing fee owed in by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account e xceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on the Watch Commander, George Bailey Detention Facility. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim. Plaintiff is granted forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed in which to file an Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/19/14. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cc: Watch Commander, George Bailey) (kaj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conyers v. San Diego Sheriff's Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: San Diego Sheriff's Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zackery T. Conyers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?