Potter v. Chex Systems, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Mark Potter
Defendant: Chex Systems, Inc. and Does 1 to 100
Case Number: 3:2013cv02272
Filed: September 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Larry Alan Burns
Presiding Judge: Nita L. Stormes
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's 21 Application for Leave to Amend. No later than fourteen calendar days after this order is entered in the docket, Potter may file a second amended complaint whose sole claim is that Chex inaccurately reported that U.S. Bank had reported Potter for account abuse. A second amended complaint that does not comply with this order is subject to being stricken. If Potter does not file a second amended complaint within the time permitted, or if he files one that does not comply with this order, this action will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/8/15. (kas)
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, and dismissing the amended complaint. If plaintiff thinks he can amend his complaint successfully, he must file an ex parte motion for leave to do so. The motion must not exceed fiv e pages and must be filed by 10/2/2014. Defendant must file a response by 10/16/2014. If the plaintiff fails to show, within the time permitted, why he should be given leave to amend, this action will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/17/14. (kas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Potter v. Chex Systems, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Potter
Represented By: Christina Michelle Sosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chex Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?