Roberts et al v. Roberts et al
| Tony Lee'vant Wright and Tina Louise Roberts |
| Tia Roberts, Tia Roberson and Tina Roberts |
| 3:2013cv02624 |
| October 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER: The Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. No later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiffs may file a second amended complaint. If Plaintiffs do not file a second amended complaint within thirty days, this case will remain closed without further order of the Court. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/13/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service - mailed to docket address: 1425 C Street, San Diego, CA 92101.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: The Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is denied as moot (Doc. 2 ), and the Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 3 ) is denied. The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. No later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff m ay file an amended complaint. If Plaintiff does not file a first amended complaint within thirty days, this case will remain closed without further order of the Court. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/5/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
