Bard Water District v. James Davey and Associates, Inc. et al
| Bard Water District |
| James Davey and Associates, Inc., James Davey and DOES 1 through 50 |
| 3:2013cv02727 |
| November 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| Peter C. Lewis |
| Jeffrey T. Miller |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF BARD WATER DISTRICT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 11/7/2018.(sjm)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER Granting 103 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 10/1/2018. (sjm)
|
|
Filing
86
Second Amended ORDER granting 85 Motion to Continue. Mandatory Settlement Conference set for 08/23/2018 is vacated and continued to 10/31/2018 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Peter C. Lewis. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 12/11/2018. Final Pret rial Conference set for 10/5/2018 is vacated and continued to 12/11/2018 08:30 AM in Courtroom 5D before Judge Jeffrey T. Miller. Jury Trial set for 11/12/2018 is vacated and continued to 1/22/2019 10:00 AM in Courtroom 5D before Judge Jeffrey T. Miller. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter C. Lewis on 3/22/2018. (gac)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER Granting 73 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim with Leave to Amend. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 3/5/2018. (mxn)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER denying 65 Motion to Dismiss Third-Party complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 11/30/2017. (jpp)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Granting 27 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 11/14/14. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with 20 days leave to amend from the filing date of this order. Should Plaintiff electto file an amended complaint, it is ordered to specifically reference documentprovisions which P laintiff contends (1) resulted in the formation of a contract between these parties, including the parties mutual assent to the contract and thematerial terms of the contract; and (2) imposed specific duties upon Defendants.Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of Plaintiffs claims with prejudice.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 8/5/14. (av1)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Granting Motion To Dismiss With Leave To Amend 12 . Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted with 20 days leave to amend from the filing date of this order. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 5/5/2014. (vam)(jrd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
