Wright v. Peters et al
Plaintiff: Mustafa Abdullah Wright
Defendant: S. Peters, T. Rucker, J. Winn, H. Asbury and E. Garza
Case Number: 3:2013cv03024
Filed: December 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Barry Ted Moskowitz
Presiding Judge: Nita L. Stormes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER: (1) Granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 15 Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies; (2) Granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 14 Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff 's Complaint; (3) Denying 25 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice. Defendants shall file and serve an Answer to the Eighth Amendment excessive force claims in Plaintiff's Complaint within the time prescribed by FED.R.CIV.P. 12(a)(4)(B). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/9/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
May 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Providing Notice to Pro Se Prisoner of Requirements for Opposing Summary Judgment Pursuant to Klingele / Rand and Setting Briefing Schedule. It is Ordered that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment has been calendared for hearing on Jun e 20, 2014 in Courtroom 15B. Your Opposition (including any supporting documents) must be filed with the Court and served on all parties by June 6, 2014. If you do not wish to oppose Defendants' Motion, you should file and serve a "Notice o f Non-Opposition" by that same date to let both the Court and Defendants know that the Motion is unopposed. If you do file and serve an Opposition, Defendants must file and serve their Reply to that Opposition by June 13, 2014. Signed by Judge B arry Ted Moskowitz on 5/9/2014.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Per ECF 15 , Per Chambers, No Oral Argument Unless Requested By the Court. Any party who believes that oral argument is necessary can separately request it.)(rlu)
January 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and Directing US Marshal to effect service of complaint. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 1/16/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Peters et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mustafa Abdullah Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Rucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Winn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H. Asbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Garza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?