Smith v. Patenaude & Felix A.P.C., Law Offices of

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District Smith v. Patenaude & Felix A.P.C., Law Offices of

Smith v. Patenaude & Felix A.P.C., Law Offices of

Plaintiff:	Kristiane Smith
Defendant:	Patenaude & Felix A.P.C., Law Offices of
Case Number:	3:2013cv03061
Filed:	December 17, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	William Q. Hayes
Presiding Judge:	Bernard G. Skomal
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 17, 2014	Filing 20 ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's Second Claim is dismissed without prejudice. No later than thirty days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend the Second Amended Complaint accompanied by a proposed third amended complaint. If Plaintiff does not file a motion for leave to amend, this case will proceed on the remaining portions of the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 12/17/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
July 23, 2014	Filing 12 ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss is granted. The First Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. No later than thirty days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend the First Amended Complaint accompanied b y a proposed second amended complaint. If Plaintiff does not file a motion for leave to amend, this case shall remain closed without further order of the Court. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/23/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 17, 2014

Filing 20 ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's Second Claim is dismissed without prejudice. No later than thirty days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend the Second Amended Complaint accompanied by a proposed third amended complaint. If Plaintiff does not file a motion for leave to amend, this case will proceed on the remaining portions of the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 12/17/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)

July 23, 2014

Filing 12 ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss is granted. The First Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. No later than thirty days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend the First Amended Complaint accompanied b y a proposed second amended complaint. If Plaintiff does not file a motion for leave to amend, this case shall remain closed without further order of the Court. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/23/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Patenaude & Felix A.P.C., Law Offices of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Patenaude & Felix A.P.C., Law Offices of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristiane Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?