Besing v. Taylor et al
| Ray G. Besing |
| University of California at San Diego Medical Center ("UCSD"), Thornton Hospital and William R. Taylor |
| 3:2013cv03159 |
| December 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David H. Bartick |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part 46 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Discovery Motion. Plaintiff's motion for a protective order staying the January 2015 depositions is Denied as moot. Defendants shall provide Dr. Robert Beatty with a check in the amount of $3,400, post-dated to January 22, 2015 by 1/9/2015. Plaintiff's motion to compel further responses to Interrogatory Nos. 1-6 and Request for Production of Documents Nos. 2 and 4 is Denied as moot. Defendants shal l serve supplemental responses to Interrogatory Nos. 7-11 by 1/16/2015. Plaintiff's motion to compel further responses to Interrogatory No. 12 and Request for Production of Documents Nos. 1, 3, 5, and 6 is Denied. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 12/31/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
