Moyer v. Cox Enterprises, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Joanne Moyer
Defendant: Cox Enterprises, Inc. and Long Term Disability Plan
Case Number: 3:2014cv00146
Filed: January 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Jan M Adler
Referring Judge: John A Houston
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Joint Motion to Dismiss the entire case with prejudice. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 07/08/14. (jpp)
July 7, 2014 Filing 15 Joint MOTION to Dismiss the Entire Case with Prejudice by Joanne Moyer. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Iler, Brooks) (jpp).
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER continuing deadline for filing of joint motion for dismissal to July 7, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 06/30/2014.(jpp)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER continuing deadline for filing of joint motion for dismissal to June 27, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 06/16/14.(jpp)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order Scheduling Settlement Disposition Conference. Joint Motion for Dismissal due: 6/13/2014. If a Joint Motion for Dismissal and Proposed Order for Dismissal are not submitted by 6/13/2014, then counsel shall contact the chambers of Magistrate Judge Adler at least one court day before the date indicated above to explain the reasons therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 4/25/2014.(sjt)
April 25, 2014 Filing 11 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler: Early Neutral Evaluation Conference held on 4/25/2014(no document attached) (kxb)
March 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 4/25/2014 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 03/17/2014.(jpp)(jrd)
March 17, 2014 Filing 9 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Cox Enterprises, Inc., Long Term Disability Plan (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Abeln, Amanda) (jpp).
March 17, 2014 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Cox Enterprises, Inc., Long Term Disability Plan. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Abeln, Amanda) (jpp).
March 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Granting #5 Joint Motion To Extend Time In Which To Respond To Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant To Civil Local Rule 12.1. Defendant Cox Enterprises, Inc., Long Term Disability have up to and including March 17, 2014 within which to file and serve a response to the Complaint. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 03/11/2014. (jpp)(jrd)
March 10, 2014 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Cox Enterprises, Inc., Long Term Disability Plan re #5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, (Abeln, Amanda) (jpp).
March 7, 2014 Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Cox Enterprises, Inc., Long Term Disability Plan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Abeln, Amanda) qc mail sent re proposed orders, no sign on cert of service, address change (kaj).
February 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Granting #3 Joint Motion To Extend Time In Which To Respond To Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendants Cox Enterprises, Inc. and Long Term Disability Plan have up to and including March 10, 2014 within which to file and serve a response to the Complaint. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 02/24/14. (jpp)(jrd)
February 24, 2014 Filing 3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Cox Enterprises, Inc., Long Term Disability Plan. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Abeln, Amanda)Attorney Amanda R. Abeln added to party Cox Enterprises, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Amanda R. Abeln added to party Long Term Disability Plan(pty:dft)(jpp).
January 21, 2014 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (dlg) (cap).
January 21, 2014 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number 0974-6687767), filed by Joanne Moyer.The new case number is 3:14-cv-146-JAH-JMA. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler are assigned to the case. (Iler, Brooks)(dlg) (cap).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moyer v. Cox Enterprises, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cox Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda R. Abeln-Overs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Long Term Disability Plan
Represented By: Amanda R. Abeln-Overs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joanne Moyer
Represented By: Brooks L Iler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?