Tyler-Mallery v. Seattle Mortgage et al
| Gloria Tyler-Mallery |
| All Representing that it is a Debt Collector with no Evidence of Debt or that it has Suffered any Financial Injury as a Result of Non-Payment of a Mortgage Loan is Attempting, Regional Trustee Services Corporation, Seattle Mortgage, Bank of America, N.A., Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc and Does 2 to 100 Inclusive |
| 3:2014cv00704 |
| March 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jill L. Burkhardt |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, requiring substitution of attorney, striking notice of lis pendens and Order of Dismissal. This action is dismissed without prejudice. I f Tyler-Mallery believes the complaint can be successfully amended, she must first substitute in qualified counsel, then either pay the filing fee or file a new IFP motion, and then file an amended complaint showing why the Court has jurisdiction over her claims. She must do all this no later than May 1, 2014 or this action will remain dismissed. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/27/14. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
